Get the best tech support and pay the lowest price on any Web hosting package with Avantex. Click here for more information.

SureMail™ is the most reliable email service there is. Get less spam and less email virusses. Unlimited autoresponders. Learn more by clicking here.
Get a free domain name when you host your site with Sun Hosting. Your choice of Linux or Windows. Click here.

Save thousands of dollars by building your own Web site. No programming skills necessary. No software to download or install. Learn more by clicking here.

Microsoft to open source Windows?

Add to     Digg this story Digg this

January 13, 2009

With all of what's currently going in the open source community, Microsoft faces some challenges to its operating system, the most visible of which is the Internet, where Google is working on relandscaping the computing industry and trying hard to redirect it towards the Web browser.

If Google achieves that feat, it will effectively turn away computing as we know it today from Windows or any other particular operating system to its own data centers. The rest will be history, especially when the Windows operating system is concerned.

Will that kill Microsoft? No, not really, although it will make a dent in its earnings...

Over the past three to four years, the ongoing shift toward the Internet and Google has actually buoyed Microsoft's smaller rivals, including Apple and various Linux distributions.

Google's operating system's strategy is the idea that what's good for the Internet is actually good for Google, and the company puts this philosophy into practice through a range of various initiatives aimed at expanding the Web, including investments in ventures such as Meraki and Clearwire.

Going back to Microsoft and its own platform supremacy, it's now clear that what's good for Windows is good for Microsoft... Probably the best move Microsoft could make to broaden its reach and strengthen the core of its Windows operating system would be to release its operating system as open source! But of course that is easier said than done.

Releasing Windows under an open-source license would greatly benefit the OS in two ways. First, an open-source Windows operating system could be had for free, which would mean more legitimate Windows users around the world and fewer barriers in upgrading to the latest version of the OS.

The end result would be a larger network of Windows nodes at which system integrators could target sales of their Windows applications.

Secondly, a move to open-source Windows would inject an enormous amount of vitality and innovation into the platform, as the legions of user organizations, vendors and developers now invested in Windows could take the platform to the next level, a bit like a much smaller community of stakeholders now does in the Linux community.

But if Windows could be had for free, how would Microsoft make its money you might ask?

Nobody is suggesting that Microsoft open-source all of what it calls Windows. Instead, the software giant could divide its OS into application elements, restrict its open-sourcing efforts to the operating system side of the equation, and then sell client and server distributions of Windows with proprietary Microsoft applications layered on top of the open-source platform.

This sort of division of tasks would help preserve existing Windows sales among customers who find value in Windows' current platform-plus-bundled-applications incarnations, while still freeing Windows to work with different business models that only Linux can now reach.

Currently, you can still build and run a whole business on Windows, but there's a limit to the range of companies where Windows fits best. The smallest startups and the very largest operations are driven to select the low-friction licensing and development flexibility of open-source platforms, and on that, Linux still has a very strong advantage over Windows.

But even if Microsoft would open source its Windows operating system, would that mean the end of the software behemoth? Not by a long shot. The company would still continue to thrive, albeit at a slower pace.

It would certainly come up with alternative ways of maintaining its revenue stream, and would continue to work in expanding it as it has done so well for so many years.

Source: HNG.

Add to     Digg this story Digg this

home | news archives | advertise with us | contact

Copyright © OS Today.   

All logos or service marks on this website are the property of their respective companies.